Some Info For The Skeptics

This video was made to highlight a few of the things that motivate 
Tony to do what he does.

Exposed: Secret Presidential Chemtrail Budget Uncovered – Congress Exceeds Billions To Spray Populace Like Roaches

How many people are still in denial about chemtrails?


—The Budget Obama Didn’t Want You To Know About
Recently, the question has been asked, What In the World Are They Spraying?
The documentary with the same name answers many of those questions.
The question the world is now asking is “Who in the World Is Spraying Us?”
The World is Now Demanding Answers and Accountability…
As an introduction to this article, we will first cover information to familiarize the uninformed readers as to the core facts and information so that a more complete understanding is possible, given this complex issue.
A recent report by CBS Atlanta detailed how some local citizens are outraged that such “crimes against humanity” are being carried out right before our eyes in secret.
In the report Sen. Johnny Isakson was interviewed on the subject of chemtrails saying quote:
“That is a theory that some people have, but there is no evidence this is happening. This is not happening.”
It looks as if members of the government’s upper echelon and even members of the Senate will go to extreme lengths to suppress this vital information from reaching the American people.
Not to mention they signed off on the multi-billion dollar per year budgets in an economic crisis, with little to no transparency to the public.
In regards to aerosol spraying into the earth’s atmosphere, a recent update to data assembled by The Carnicom Institute reveals the chemicals used and their respective levels of concentration. The toxic levels that are being used in these aerosols goes beyond shocking – it would appear that these levels are indeed criminal by EPA Standards.
An Updated Look at Aerosol Toxins – Part 1
By Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri –
Copyright © 2011 – All Rights Reserved
February 3, 2011
(Excerpt from Report)
A new preliminary draft report by ArizonaSkyWatch shows dramatic increases in heavy metals that simply do not belong in our air. NOTE: The level of Manganese is so shockingly high that ArizonaSkyWatch also included additional information about it (see below). This report will be posted online shortly.
This is only a preliminary overview of Arizona Air Particulates.

2010 Air Particulates
These figures indicate how many times they are over the allowable toxic limit:
Aluminum: 15.8
Antimony: 63.3
Arsenic: 418
Barium: 5.3
Cadmium: 6.0
Chromium: 6.4
Copper: 9.0
Iron: 43.5
Lead: 15.7
Manganese: 513.8
Nickel: 10.7
Zinc: 7.5

Additional Research & Videos are at the CaliforniaSkyWatch.com & theAgricultureDefenseCoalition.org.
Interestingly enough, Monsanto has just released an Aluminum Resistant Seed which is Genetically Modified to tolerate Aluminum in high levels in the soil. Is this a coincidence, or do they know something?
“Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people.” – Henry Kissinger
See also: Henry Kissinger National Security Study Memorandum 200
“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” – Richard Haass- Club of Rome
Another famous quote;
When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. Whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government. - Thomas Jefferson

LINKS FOR CURRENT SOURCES

David Keith GeoEngineering
Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research (FICER) Purpose
The Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research (FICER) exists to accelerate the innovative development and evaluation of science and technology to address carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions and their environmental consequences.
The non-profit research fund focuses on early-stage innovative research where relatively small and timely grants can significantly advance understanding, especially of the viability and scalability of proposals to address global warming.
Funded research projects are intended to produce peer-reviewed scholarly articles in recognized professional scientific and technical journals. Any intellectual property that may be generated in the course of such research resides with the researchers or their institutions.
Grants for research are provided to the University of Calgary from gifts made by Mr. Bill Gates from his personal funds.
The activities of the Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research fall outside the scope of activities of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. FICER is not a Foundation project and has no relationship with it.
The fund has supported research in a wide range of areas. Some examples include:
• understanding carbon dioxide emissions associated with international trade in goods and services;
• developing technologies to capture carbon dioxide out of the air; and
• climate modeling to understand possible environmental consequences of solar radiation management.
Report On GeoEngineering
A select group of diabolic oligarch globalists and their puppet cronies embedded within the United States government are now involved in what some would say are crimes against humanity. These tyrants will stop at nothing to usher their hush, hush global aerosol agenda into full swing.
According to a report prepared for the Air Force titled “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the WeatherBy 2025” the U.S. Air Force wants to fully control the weather on earth by the year 2025.
Far surpassing even the most horrific act of terror (real or staged), posing as literal gods, these globalists will stop at nothing to control the world by not only controlling the fraudulent banking systems but by owning the weather through a process (blanket term) calledGeoengineering.
According to globalist sponsored reports, our planet is in a constant state of threat and is being bombarded with radioactive solar rays increasing planetary temperatures due to human carbon emissions.
However, vast bodies of research now show that that is not the case and that global warming is a another globalist myth, a ponzi scheme to collect a Carbon Tax worldwide, benefitting the very same group behind the curtain.
The myth the global warming “Carbon Tax” pushers have been spouting apparently can only be fixed by spraying deadly toxins in an aerosol particulate form into the earths atmosphere via large sprayer converted aircraft specifically assigned to perform Geoengineering tasks.
Aerosol sprays (slang: Chemtrails) are filled with a variety of chemical and metal compounds and are known to be very hazardous to human, plant, and animal health worldwide. This danger to plant and human and animal health has been documented in films such as “What In the World Are They Spraying” by Michael Murphy & G. Edward Griffin, who have also appeared on the Intel Hub Radio Show with Shepard Ambellas.
Ultimately, this issue was originally a matter for the EPA to rule over considering that they have the authority to sanction geoengineering activities under the National Environmental Policy ACT of 1969. However, documents such as the report to the chairman, Committee of Science and Technology, House of Representatives – “Climate Change” – Sept. 2010, U.S. Gov. Accountability Office which was submitted to all members of congress in 2010 attempt to put control into the hands of even a smaller group of people.
This report clearly is slanted and leans to take control away from the EPA along with other regulatory provisions such as; the Endangered Species ACT, and the Conformity Provision in the Clean Air ACT – total Geoengineering dis-info submitted to members of the Congress and other government branches alike.
The source of most of the dis-info is Obama’s White House Science Czar John P. Holdren. The following was written on USGCRP letterhead;
“January 2011,
Members of Congress:
On behalf of the National Science and Technology Council, I am transmitting a copy of Our Changing Planet: The U.S. Global Change Research Program for Fiscal Year 2011. The report describes the activities and plans of the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) established under the Global Change Research Act (GCRA) of 1990. The USGCRP coordinates and integrates scientific research on climate and global change and is supported by 13 participating departments and agencies of the U.S. government. This Fiscal Year 2011 edition of Our Changing Planet highlights recent advances and progress made by participating agencies and includes budget information on each agency’s contribution.
This report describes a program in transition. In accordance with the GCRA, the USGCRP agencies requested guidance from the National Research Council on how to best meet the changing needs of the nation to understand climate change and respond to its impacts, and the NRC responded with a 2009 report entitled “Restructuring Federal Climate Research to Meet the Challenges of Climate Change”. In accord with that report’s recommendations, the USGCRP is undergoing a strategic realignment that will ensure that the science produced is maximally useful for decision makers at all scales. As described in the new edition of Our Changing Planet, the program going forward will place greater emphasis on impacts, vulnerabilities, and on understanding the options for adapting to the changing climate. The program will also continue its long-standing support for activities that contribute to a better understanding of the Earth system, including observations, research, and predictive modeling.
All of these focuses will be reflected in the USGCRP’s new strategic plan and its National Climate Assessment.
The USGCRP is committed to its mission to build a knowledge base that informs human responses to global change through coordinated and integrated federal programs of research, education, communication, and decision support. I appreciate the close cooperation of the participating agencies, and I look forward to working with the Congress in the continued development and implementation of this essential national program.
Sincerely,
John P. Holdren Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy Assistant to the President for Science and Technology” – Our Changing Planet
Even more disturbing then that is the fact that your so called representatives have been approving yearly geoengineering budgets in the upwards of billions of dollars per year (as outlined in the document “Our Changing Planet – The US Global Change Research Program for the Fiscal Year of 2011, which is a supplement to the Presidents Budget for 2011, much of which is unaccounted for and not even included in the budget possible signifying even a more nefarious plot involving some black budget.
Back tracking to the year 2001, President elect George W. Bush established the (CCRI) Climate Change Research Initiative. A year later it was made public that the USGCRP or United States Global Change Research program and the CCRI both would become what is known as the (CCSP) Climate Change Science Program. Now, under the Obama Administration the legacy continues to move forward as the USGCRP.
A report entitled “Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States” released in 2009, documents how the USGCRP divided the US into nine regions similar to FEMA regions. Also tucked into the report was the statement “A central finding of the report was that the vast majority of climate scientists agree that global warming is unequivocal and primarily human induced” – Source: Our Changing Planet.
The document goes on to mention the devastating effects of climate change, including the effect on crops, human health and livestock.
But the most startling fact in the document is the actual budget itself, a mere 2.7 billion for 2011 alone (not including many costs) 24% higher than 2010’s budget.
The Global Change Research ACT of 1990, SEC. 102, Committee on Earth and Environmental Sciences states;
a) ESTABLISHMENT.–The President, through the Council, shall establish a Committee on Earth and Environmental Sciences. The Committee shall carry out Council functions under section 401 of the National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 6651) relating to global change research, for the purpose of increasing the overall effectiveness and productivity of Federal global change research efforts.
(b) MEMBERSHIP.–The Committee shall consist of at least one representative from–
1. the National Science Foundation;
2. the National Aeronautics and Space Administration;
3. the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the Department of Commerce;
4. the Environmental Protection Agency;
5. the Department of Energy;
6. the Department of State;
7. the Department of Defense;
8. the Department of the Interior;
9. the Department of Agriculture;
10. the Department of Transportation;
11. the Office of Management and Budget;
12. the Office of Science and Technology Policy;
13. the Council on Environmental Quality;
14. the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health; and
15. such other agencies and departments of the United States as the President or the Chairman of the Council considers appropriate.
Such representatives shall be high ranking officials of their agency or department, wherever possible the head of the portion of that agency or department that is most relevant to the purpose of the title described in section 101(b).
(c) CHAIRPERSON.–The Chairman of the Council, in consultation with the Committee, biennially shall select one of the Committee members to serve as Chairperson. The Chairperson shall be knowledgeable and experienced with regard to the administration of scientific research programs, and shall be a representative of an agency that contributes substantially, in terms of scientific research capability and budget, to the Program.
(d) SUPPORT PERSONNEL.–An Executive Secretary shall be appointed by the Chairperson of the
Committee, with the approval of the Committee. The Executive Secretary shall be a permanent employee of one of the agencies or departments represented on the Committee, and shall remain in the employ of such agency or department. The Chairman of the Council shall have the authority to make personnel decisions regarding any employees detailed to the Council for purposes of working on business of the Committee pursuant to section 401 of the National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 6651).
(e) FUNCTIONS RELATIVE TO GLOBAL CHANGE.–The Council, through the Committee, shall be responsible for planning and coordinating the Program. In carrying out this responsibility, the Committee shall–
1. serve as the forum for developing the Plan and for overseeing its implementation;
2. improve cooperation among Federal agencies and departments with respect to global change research activities;
3. provide budgetary advice as specified in section 105;
4. work with academic, State, industry, and other groups conducting global change research, to
provide for periodic public and peer review of the Program;
5. cooperate with the Secretary of State in– (A) providing representation at international meetings and conferences on global change research in which the United States participates; and
(B) coordinating the Federal activities of the United States with programs of other nations and with international global change research activities such as the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program;
6. consult with actual and potential users of the results of the Program to ensure that such results are useful in developing national and international policy responses to global change; and
7. report at least annually to the President and the Congress, through the Chairman of the Council, on Federal global change research priorities, policies, and programs.”
The following is a list of the members included in the Subcommittee on Global Change Research;
SUBCOMMITTEE ON GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH
Made up of the following members:
Thomas Karl -Department of Commerce Chair
Thomas Armstrong - Department of the Interior Vice Chair, Adaptation Research
Mike Freilich - National Aeronautics and Space Administration Vice Chair, Integrated Observations
Timothy Killeen - National Science Foundation Vice Chair, Strategic Planning
William Breed -U.S. Agency for International Development
John Balbus - Department of Health and Human Services
William Hohenstein - Department of Agriculture
Jack Kaye - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Chester Koblinsky - Department of Commerce
Linda Lawson - Department of Transportation
Leonard Hirsch - Smithsonian Institution
Anna Palmisano - Department of Energy
A description of the subcommittee on (p.2) Our Changing Planet Reads;
“The USGCRP is directed by the Subcommittee for Global Change Research (SGCR), which falls under the National Science and Technology Council. The SGCR comprises representatives from 13 departments and agencies and is led by a Chair from one of the participating agencies (currently from the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA]). In order to align the program’s governance with the needs, Vice- Chairs have been identified for Strategic Planning, Integrated Observations, and Adaptation Research. Additional vice-chairs will be identified as needed. The program is supported by the USGCRP Integration and Coordination Office and conducts many of its activities through interagency working groups that plan and implement research and crosscutting activities, such as communications, decision support, and information and data concerns. The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) work closely with the SGCR, the Integration and Coordination Office, and the interagency working groups to establish research priorities and funding plans to ensure that the program is aligned with national priorities, reflects agency planning, and meets the requirements of the GCRA. “
The Subcommittee in question has now supplied the President with a supplement to the fiscal budget for 2011, which was presented to members of congress in January of 2011 on behalf of the National Science and Technology Policy – Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, John P. Holdren.
The (USGCRP) brings together a total of 13 different agencies and merges them into one single agency program that has been in the works science 1988 or prior.
In 1990 the USGCRP received generous congressional support under (GCRA P.L. 101-606). It is no mystery that aerosol spraying operations have been ongoing since the early 1990’s. Prior to 1990 one could enjoy a true clear blue sky, a figment of the past in 2011 – where none are to be found.
So just how deep does the geoengineering/terraforming rabbit hole go? The Intel Hub was able to obtain a copy of the final report prepared by the University of Calgary under contract by Aurora Flight Sciences titled “Geoengineering cost analysis.”
In the report there is smoking gun evidence of the entire geoengineering saga from the secret bases, to the payload, to what type of aircraft or “airship” will be the most cost effective to spread toxic particulates throughout the earths atmosphere.
The final report also included budgets for different applications for aerosol dispersal within the atmosphere.
“Existing aircraft are evaluated based on cost of acquisition and operations. An in-depth new aircraft design study and cost analysis was conducted to determine the cost of developing and operating a dedicated geoengineering airplane type. Similarly, an airship design study and cost analysis was conducted. Finally a survey of non-aircraft systems was conducted to determine how their costs compare to aircraft and airships.
Yearly costs of 1M tonne geoengineering operations for all the systems examined are presented in Figure 2. Some systems are easily written off due to extremely high costs. Rocket based systems are not cost competitive due to the large number of launches required and the impact of occasional rocket failures on required fleet size. A system based on 16Σ” naval Mark 7 guns was analyzed and compared to previous work by the National Research Council.4 This system requires large numbers of shots increasing projectile costs and driving yearly costs over $100B. Gun costs become more competitive if the projectile payload fraction can be increased from about 10% for a standard shell to 50%. With this and a few improvements over the 1940-era Mark 7 gun yearly costs are still in the $20B range….The primary vehicles examined to lift particulate to stratospheric altitudes and disperse them at a predetermined release rate are airplanes and airships; rockets and other non- aircraft methods such as guns and suspended pipes are also surveyed.” –Aurora Flight Sciences: Geoengineering Final Report (p.5)
“Geoengineering may provide a means to create a time buffer against catastrophic climate change while long-term emissions reduction actions take effect. One approach is to disperse sulfur compounds at high altitude to reduce the effective solar flux entering the atmosphere. This report will evaluate the means of delivering sufficient mass of this or similar material to affect climate change on a global scale. The goal of this study is to use engineering design and cost analysis to determine the feasibility and cost of a delivering material to the stratosphere for solar radiation management (SRM). This study does notexamine effectiveness or risks of injecting material into the stratosphere for SRM. Its goal is simply to compare a range of delivery systems on a single cost basis.” – Aurora Flight Sciences: Geoengineering Final Report (p.6)
The report mentions how payload costs are not included in the estimate nor are the base/facility costs and continues on (p.8) to say;
“This study focuses on airplane and airship operations to the stratosphere to release a geoengineering payload with the goal of reducing incoming solar flux. Airships are also considered for this mission. To provide a comparison to conventional aircraft operations, more exotic concepts such as rockets, guns, and suspended pipes are also examined….For maximum cooling impact, the particulate payloads are best placed near the equator. This study assumes that the payload is released within latitudes 30°N and 30°S, though North-South basing location had minimal effect on cost. Transit operations, flying East- West between equally spaced bases around the equator, were examined as a method to ensure adequate dispersal of the payload around the equator. Global winds aid in East-West dispersal so a smaller number of bases and shorter range systems (referred to as Regional operations) can be employed with minimal impact on dispersal. Region- al operations allow the dispersal leg length to be dictated by the desired release rate of 0.03kg/m flown. This means the airplanes fly no further than they have to, on the order of 300-800 km, and fuel costs are minimized.” – Aurora Flight Sciences: Geoengineering Final report Yearly cost estimates from different dispersal methods ranged from over 1 billion dollars a year all the way up to rocket dispersed aerosol in the upper atmosphere at the cost of over 100 billion dollars per year.
GeoEngineering Research 2011
California SkyWatch
Agriculture Defense Coalition
GeoEngineering Watch
Arizona SkyWatch
Henry Kissinger’s 1974 Plan for Food Control Genocide
Food Sovereignty
Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government.” – Henry Kissinger in an address to the Bilderbergers at Evian, France, May 21, 1992.
Note: Websites/News Agencies are welcome to post 50% of this article linking back to us. Or contact us to post in full.
UPDATE – March 31st, 2011
• Aluminum resistant gene patent # 7582809
• Patent granted on September 1, 2009
• Patent developed at the Robert W. Holley Center for Agricultural Health at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY.
• Leon Kochian and Jurandir Vieira de Magallhaes are the primary inventors/ researchers
• Patent assigned to US Department of Agriculture and Brazilian Enterprise for Agricultural Research
• According to Cornell University Chronicle Online, the research project was supported in part by the McKnight Foundation Collaborative Crop Research Program, the Generation Challenge Program, the National Science Foundation and the USDA.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a contributor to both the McKnight Foundation and the Generation Challenge Program.
http://www.mcknight.org/international/cropresearch.aspx
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/press-releases/Pages/molecular-breeding-platform-aims-to-enhance-plant-breeding-090901.aspx
Hundreds of Rain and Snow Tests HAVE BEEN DONE!
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/htm/tests.html
 source --  In5d Esoteric Metaphysical and Spiritual Database  on Facebook!!  ;)

Chemtrails Air Canada nozzle modification pic!!

They are spraying levels of altitudes. They spray at some lower level, and
also around 34,000 feet. Between those levels is no spray, and it is
obvious that they are making 2 sets of sun blockage layers of chemical
aerosol suspensions (clouds).

They have planes that skim the top layer and add to that layer, maintaining it,
or adding to it.


There is no clear visibility to the ground at all - continent wide
(Canada to Mexico) - even in the open spaces ---> you can see the
light suspension of chemicals (nano particles) falling down on all
cities, and everywhere there is an opening for the sun to shine on.

They are also spraying at altitudes higher than 37,000 feet - we have to stop them.

You cannot get any trails at all that high as the relative humidity is
about 1 percent - or even less.... so it is physically impossible to
have any sort of trail other than a chemical trail, and they are lasting
hours - almost un-spread - they take forever to spread out - HUMIDITY
from condensation would diffuse - diffusion = going from a high
concentration to a low concentration ----> the chemicaltrails don't
diffuse fast like condensation would - and that is because they are laid
down at low pressures, not THRUST pressures of the exhaust.

They won't let you even take pictures of the outside of a commercial jet.
"DON'T TAKE PICTURES!!!" - they commanded! repeatedly!

Look at the nozzle at the pylon - in line with exhaust output!

The nozzles and the area below and to the front - are modifications -
look at the color difference in the metals. It is an ADD-ON.

"DON'T TAKE PICTURES!!!" - they commanded! repeatedly!

Also... look at the blue sky above the plane - it's not blue - not really blue like it should be.

"DON'T TAKE PICTURES!!!" - they commanded! repeatedly!

 

http://detoxwithDE.com

Emergency Food Storage List for People with Limited Incomes

This list provides 30 days of nourishing meals with 2500 calories per day per person for a family of 4.

Additional items that would enhance this diet include cream of mushroom soup, instant potatoes, syrup, sprouting seeds, tea, more canned meats, vegetables, fruit, & dried beans/peas, tomato/spaghetti sauce. From these ingredients you can prepare: donuts, chocolate cake, chili mac casserole, biscuits,macaroni
& cheese, tortillas, chili & rice, bread,rice pudding, Spanish rice, pasta and various sauces, hush puppies, gluten steaks/meatless loaf, bean loaf, cookies (among the many possibilities). 

Measure portions carefully. If you typically don't include these foods in your diet,and this is what you plan to store, start cooking with them now. Don't wait for an emergency to start a new diet. This helps save on your current food bill too, and thus helps you to put aside more food now for an emergency later. If you can't buy it all at once, buy a little at a time until you have 2 or 3 months emergency supplies on hand. 

Store carefully so roaches and rodents don't get in -- look for food grade plastic containers such as 5 or 6 gallon buckets with lids. You can often get them cheap or even free at bakeries, donut shops, restaurants, or other places that serve a lot of food. Empty 2liter pop bottles are another cheap storage container for dry goods like beans, rice, and flour. Rotate your supplies, use some of the flour, rice, beans or whatever, and then buy more. "Store what you eat, and eat what you store." Use this list as a guide, customize it to meet the needs and tastes of your family.

FLUORIDATION: Mind Control of the Masses

People need to know about this POISON. This video was taken by someone who works at a water treatment plant and wanted people to see what is being put into the water. > "Fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this century, if not of all time."--Robert Carton, Ph.D. former US EPA scientist.
The Truth Will Set You Free

"We would not purposely add arsenic to the water supply. And we would not purposely add lead. But we do add fluoride. The fact is that fluoride is more toxic than lead and just slightly less toxic than arsenic." ----Dr. John Yiamouyiannis
[Probably the best example of the presence and power of Evil, it's Human Abuse, and Mind Control. Anyone pushing this is either a Psychopath, Social dominator, or Authoritarian follower. A minute amount of Common Sense is needed to see through fluoridation, it's more toxic than lead! Similar to the propaganda that says it is safe to inject Mercury into babies and pregnant women. If the dental and medical leaders really cared about dental health we wouldn't be eating Junk Food, (and having medical men promoting sugar) but instead, we would be eating the correct diet and have perfect teeth like the people Weston Price discovered and wrote about (and fewer dentists). It's not just in the water.
Fluoride can attach to Aluminium to enter and accumulate in the brain as a powerful brain toxin (1)---think vaccines, other drugs such as Antacids, SSRI, drink containers and cooking utensils. The poisoners know that, just the fact the governments still let people cook on aluminium is a crime in itself. Fluoride also increases the uptake of lead.]
"In point of fact, fluoride causes more human cancer death, and causes it faster than any other chemical."--Dean Burk -- Congressional Record 21 July 1976
"They (ACS) lie like scoundrels."----Dean Burk, Ph.D., 34 years at the National Cancer Institute. —
The Truth Will Set You Free
Dr Dean Burk National Cancer Institute says his Fluoride study links to increase cancer risk -
"When you have power you don't have to tell the truth. That's a rule that's been working in this world for generations. And there are a great many people who don't tell the truth when they are in power in administrative positions."
---Dr. Dean Burk former head of National Cancer Institute Research.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzgKA5zMitQ
H2oLabs Home Water Distillers Make Water As Pure As It Can Be.
Water Distillers and Water Distillation Systems from H2oLabs make the PUREST water possible to drink. No other type of water filter or water purifier, including reverse osmosis or any other water purification system, can make water as pure.
http://www.h2olabs.co.uk/
FLUORIDATION: Mind Control of the Masses - by Ian E. Stephen (1995)
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/salud/salud_fluor06.htm
(Anyone interested in a PDF file of this Nexus article(s), send me a PM with your email address)
Material Safety Data Sheet -Sodium fluoride MSDS
http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9927595
Material Safety Data Sheet - Fluosilicic acid MSDS
http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9924083
FLUORIDE OVERDOSE: National Institutes of Health - POISON CONTROL
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002650.htm
Fluoride Action Network
http://www.fluoridealert.org/
Scientific Facts on the Biological Effects of Fluorides
http://www.all-natural.com/fleffect.html
Why EPA'S Headquarters Union of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation
http://www.nofluoride.com/epa_hirzy_letter.htm
FLUORIDE ... The Aging Factor
How to Recognize and Avoid the Devastating Effects of Fluoride
John A. Yiamouyiannis, Ph.D. (1943-2000)
http://fluoridationqueensland.com/blog/2010/08/03/fluoride-the-aging-factor/
Dr. John McDougall interview with Dr. John Yiamouyannis - 3/10/96 (MP3)
http://maebrussell.com/Fluoride/DrJohnYiamouyannis.mp3
The Greatest "Scientific" Fluoride Fraud Yet?
http://www.nofluoride.com/nexus_article.cfm
50 Reasons to Avoid Fluoridation
http://www.fluoridealert.org/50-reasons.htm
Human Toxicity, Environmental Impact and Legal Implications of Water Fluoridation - (February 2012)
http://www.enviro.ie/Summary_Report_Fluoridation.pdf
Fluoridation: Governmentally Approved Poison
http://www.arthritistrust.org/Articles/Fluoride.pdf
Fluoride does not reduce cavities and does causes brittle bones and a soft brain
http://harmonyhealth.wordpress.com/2008/02/29/floride-does-not-reduce-cavitie...
Fluoride: A Chronological History
http://www.infiniteunknown.net/2010/10/31/fluoride-a-chronological-history/
Oregon Federal Judge Hands Darlene Sherrell a Major Victory Anti-Fluoridation Milestone
http://www.healthfreedomlaw.com/
Michigan Mandatory Fluoridation Law Repealed
http://tflna.com/sites/default/files/v25_2_April-June_79_Michigan_mandatory_l...
Frequently Asked Questions about Fluoride
http://antiagingchoices.com/dental_care_products/fluoride_toxic.htm
Is Fluoride and Fluoridation Causing/Contributing To Cancer & Other Diseases
http://www.healingcancernaturally.com/fluoridation-may-cause-cancer.html
Dare to Think -- A Message About Fluoride, written by Darlene Sherrell
http://libaware.economads.com/daretothink.php
Fluoride Poisoning Symptoms
http://www.poisonfluoride.com/pfpc/html/symptoms.html
Fluoride Health Effects Database
http://fluoridepoison.weebly.com/research.html
How to Detox Fluorides from Your Body
http://www.naturalnews.com/026605_fluoride_fluorides_detox.html
Does Water Fluoridation have Negative Side Effects?
http://www.orthomolecular.org/library/jom/2001/pdf/2001-v16n02-p073.pdf
NEXUS MAGAZINE: THE GREATEST "SCIENTIFIC" FLUORIDE FRAUD YET?
http://www.nofluoride.com/nexus_article.cfm
Distilled Water vs. Filtered Water vs Bottled - The Journey of Water Documentary
= http://youtu.be/soreXZkNEy8
********************************************************
★ Brought to you today by Mark Weaver
http://detoxwithDE.com
http://heavenandearthpowder.info
http://healthyadvantage.blogspot.com
http://mwweaver.com
http://blastyoururl.com
Diatomaceous Earth for Your Health(DE) aka Fossil Shell Flour ... Some of the 1500 everyday uses for DE -->> L•¿•K at these Keywords -->> Adult Health, More Energy, Bone Health, Bursitis, Arthritis, Lower Cholesterol, Brain/ Mood, Candida, Cardiovascular, Detoxification, Regular Bowel Movements, Lowering Of Blood Pressure, Complexion, Sinus, Cough, Eliminate Parasites, Diabetes, Hemorrhoids, Digestive Health, Hair/ Nails, Skin Care, Hay Fever, Immune Health, Joint Health, Muscle Growth/Regeneration, Skin, Sleep/ Relaxation, Stress, Weight Loss, Parasites, Colon Cleanse, Colon, Women's Health, Men's Health, Bug Control, Fleas, Bed Bugs, Ants, Spiders, Roaches, Flies, Lice, According to a top cancer researcher, it is also the best natural chelating product available(and affordable) - for pulling heavy metals from the bloodstream. Many believe that the increase in the number of cases of Heavy metal poisoning has occurred in part due to mercury in vaccines, fluoridated water, deodorants with aluminum, some seafood, foil wrap, cooking in aluminum cookware, and a number of other ways. .... and now even found to help with effects from... YES "chemtrail/geo-engineering and radiation fallout,also in recent studies may remove food additive toxins too along with fluoride"

Bill Gates Admits to Chemtrails…

Geo-engineers are finally coming out of the “chemtrail” closet, as reports are now emerging about deliberate plans in the works to dump untold tons of sulfate chemicals into the atmosphere for the purported purpose of fighting so-called “global warming.” The U.K.’s Guardian and others are reporting that a multi-million dollar research fund, which just so happens to have been started and funded by Microsoft founder and vaccine enthusiast Bill Gates, is being used to fund the project. A large balloon hovering at 80,000 feet over Fort Sumner, New Mexico, will release the sulfates into the atmosphere within the next year.

The stated purpose for this massive release of toxic sulfate particles is that doing so will allegedly reflect sunlight back into the atmosphere, and thus cool the planet. But many environmental groups and advocates of common sense are decrying the idea as dangerous, and one that could result in permanent damage to ecosystems all across the globe.
“Impacts include the potential for further damage to the ozone layer, and disruption of rainfall, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, potentially threatening the food supplies of billions of people,” said Pat Mooney, Executive Director of the ETC Group, a Canadian environmental protection group.
“It will do nothing to decrease levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere or halt ocean acidification. And solar geo-engineering is likely to increase the risk of climate-related international conflict, given that the modeling to date shows it poses greater risks to the global south.” But the Gates-backed cohort is persistent in its efforts to geo-graffiti the world, as its scientists insist that governments are not doing enough to fight back against the supposed environment impacts of global warming. If governments refuse to implement high enough carbon taxes to eliminate greenhouse gases, in other words, then Gates and Co. believes it has no choice but to “save the planet” by polluting it with sulfate particles. Spraying the skies with sulfate particles will destroy the planet faster than ‘global warming’ ever could
chemtrails bill gatesSulfate particles are toxic, though, and constitute the very same type of ambient particulate matter (PM) that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers to be a noxious air pollutant. Deliberately spraying the skies with tiny particles composed of any material, for that matter, is hazardous both to respiratory health in humans and animals, as well as to water sources, soils, and other delicate environmental resources.
“Sulfate particles from acid rain can cause harm to the health of marine life in the rivers and lakes it contaminates, and can result in mortality,” says an online water pollution guide (http://www.water-pollution.org.uk/health.html). A University of Washington (UW) report also explains that sulfate particles “contribute to acid rain, cause lung irritation, and have been a main culprit in causing the haze that obscures a clear view of the Grand Canyon.”
Blocking the sun with reflective particles will also deprive humans of natural sunlight exposure, which is a primary source for naturally generating health-promoting vitamin D in the body. So once again, Bill Gates is at the helms of a project that seeks to control the climate in artificial ways using toxic chemicals, an endeavor that is sure to create all sorts of potentially irreversible problems for humanity and the planet.

Source | TheGuardian | InfoWars

Meat From Diseased Animals Approved For Consumers ,,, YUCK!!!

WASHINGTON - The federal agency overseeing food inspection is imposing new rules reclassifying as safe for human consumption animal carcasses with cancers, tumors and open sores.

Federal meat inspectors and consumer groups are protesting the move to classify tumors and open sores as aesthetic problems, which permits the meat to get the government's purple seal of approval as a wholesome food product.
"I don't want to eat pus from a chicken that has pneumonia. I think it's gross," said Wenonah Hauter, director of Public Citizen's Critical Mass Energy Project. "Most Americans don't want to eat this sort of contamination in their meals."
Delmer Jones, a federal food inspector for 41 years who lives in Renlap, Ala., said he's so revolted by the lowering of food wholesomeness standards that he doesn't buy meat at the supermarket anymore because he doesn't trust that it is safe to eat.
"I eat very little to no meat, but sardines and fish," said Jones, president of the National Joint Council of Meat Inspection Locals, a union of 7,000 meat inspectors nationwide affiliated with the American Federation of Government Employees. He said he's trying to get his wife to stop eating meat. "I've told her what she's eating."
The union is battling related Agriculture Department plans to rely on scientific testing of samples of butchered meats to determine the wholesomeness of meat, rather than traditional item-by-item scrutiny by federal inspectors. A 1959 federal law requires inspectors from the Agriculture Department's Food Inspection and Safety System to inspect all slaughtered animals before they can be sold for human consumption.
The Agriculture Department began implementing the new policy as part of a pilot project in 24 slaughter houses last October, and plans to expand the system nationwide covering poultry, beef and pork. The agency this month extended until Aug. 29 the time for the public to comment on the regulations, and won't issue final rules until after the comments are received.
In 1998, the inspections and safety system reclassified an array of animal diseases as being "defects that rarely or never present a direct public health risk" and said "unaffected carcass portions" could be passed on to consumers by cutting out lesions.
Among animal diseases the agency said don't present a health danger are:
- Cancer;
- A pneumonia of poultry called airsacculitis;
- Glandular swellings or lymphomas;
- Sores;
- Infectious arthritis;
- Diseases caused by intestinal worms.
In the case of tumors, the guidelines state: "remove localized lesion(s) and pass unaffected carcass portions."
"They just cut off the areas,'' said Carol Blake, spokeswoman for the Agriculture Department's inspection and safety system.
But Jones and consumer groups say production lines are moving so fast that they can't catch all the diseased carcasses, and some are ending up on supermarket shelves.
"When I started inspecting, inspectors were looking at 13 birds a minute, then 40, and now it's 91 birds a minute with three inspectors. You cannot do your job with 91 birds a minute," Jones said.
The Agriculture Department is also experimenting with proposed rules that would require federal food inspectors to monitor what the plant employees are doing, rather than inspecting each carcass individually. They are aimed at bringing a new scientific approach to federal meat inspection to cut down on E. coli bacteria and other contamination.
The inspection and safety agency says a survey of pilot plants using the new system concluded that less than 1 percent of the poultry examined at the end of the production line and released for public consumption was unwholesome.
At a public hearing on the findings this year, Karen Henderson of Agriculture's division of field operations admitted that defective carcasses are being approved for human use under the pilot program.
"Absolutely. There's no system that we are aware of that is capable of removing every defect from the process," she said.
Felicia Nestor, director of the Government Accountability Project, a Washington watchdog group, said the pilot project found chickens with higher levels of fecal and other contamination than in traditional methods of inspecting.
"A lot of diseased animals are going out," she said.
A. Raymond Randolph, a federal appeals court judge, this month said federal food safety laws require meat and poultry inspectors to examine every carcass that moves through slaughterhouses and processing plants.
"The laws clearly contemplate that when inspections are done, it will be federal inspectors, rather than private employees, who will make the critical determination whether a product is adulterated or unadulterated," he said. "Under the proposed plan, federal inspectors would be inspecting people, not carcasses."

By Lance Gay gayl@shns.com
Scripps Howard News Service
http://rense.com/general2/bf.htm